SMDX vs VTI

SMDX vs VTI

Which is better, SMDX or VTI?

Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. SMDX led over 1Y and the full window. SMDX is less concentrated, with 9.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.6%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: SMDXLess Concentrated: SMDX

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSMDXVTI
Expense Ratio0.35%0.03%Best
AUM$125M$689.2B
Dividend Yield0.53%1.06%
Holdings1,1093,542
YTD Return+14.87%Best+12.23%
1Y Return+18.89%Best+12.74%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.44%
5Y Return (annualized)-+10.83%
Volatility (annualized)12.5%Best12.6%
Max Drawdown-14.5%Best-16.5%
$10,000 over 1.7 years$13,274Best$13,040
Top 10 Weight9.4%Best34.6%
Fund FamilyIntech ETFVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 1, 2025May 24, 2001

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 28, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1.7 years).

SMDX vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.

SMDX vs VTI Performance

Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (SMDX) is an ETF from Intech ETF and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SMDX returned +18.89% while VTI returned +12.74%. Year to date, SMDX is up 14.87% versus a gain of 12.23% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 12.5% for SMDX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.5% for SMDX and -16.5% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SMDX charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SMDX currently yields 0.53% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

SMDX already in VTI97.8%
VTI already in SMDX4.1%

97.8% of SMDX's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 4.1% of VTI's money is in holdings SMDX also owns.

Most of SMDX is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

543 positions in common, counted across the 552 positions we hold weights for in SMDX and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 1,109 and 3,542.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 819 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SMDX (93.0% of the fund), and 6 for SMDX that do not appear in VTI (1.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SMDXWeight in VTIDifference
THCTenet Healthcare Corp Common Stock Usd 0.051.32%0.03%1.29%
JLLJones Lang Lasalle Inc.1.15%0.02%1.13%
DINOHollyfrontier1.04%0.02%1.02%
EWBCEast West Bancorp, Inc.0.94%0.02%0.92%
XPOXpo Logistics Inc.0.92%0.03%0.89%
UTHRUnited Therapeutics Corp0.87%0.03%0.84%
USFDUS Foods Holding Corp0.79%0.03%0.76%
WWDWoodward Inc0.79%0.03%0.76%
LAMRLamar Advertising Co0.78%0.02%0.76%
AMGAffiliated Managers Group Inc.0.79%0.01%0.78%

97.8% of SMDX is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

SMDXVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SMDX or VTI?

SMDX has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, SMDX or VTI?

Over the past year SMDX returned +18.89% vs +12.74% for VTI, so SMDX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SMDX annualized +18.13% vs +16.90% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, SMDX or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 12.5% for SMDX. Worst drawdown: SMDX -14.5% vs VTI -16.5%.

Should I hold both SMDX and VTI?

SMDX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between SMDX and VTI?

97.8% of SMDX's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 4.1% of VTI's is in holdings SMDX also owns. They hold 543 positions in common, counted across the 552 positions we hold weights for in SMDX and 3,464 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, SMDX or VTI?

SMDX yields 0.53% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than SMDX?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. SMDX led over 1Y and the full window. SMDX is less concentrated, with 9.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.