SMHC vs VXUS
VanEck China Semiconductor ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, SMHC or VXUS?
VXUS costs less.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SMHC | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $163.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.38% |
| Holdings | 54 | 9,293 |
| YTD Return | -42.00% | +8.79%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +11.84% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.90% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.84% |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 23, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
SMHC vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SMHC vs VXUS Performance
VanEck China Semiconductor ETF (SMHC) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, SMHC is down 42.00% versus a gain of 8.79% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SMHC charges 0.65% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $5 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SMHC currently yields 0.00% against 2.38% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 98.7% of SMHC's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 89.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of SMHC is already inside VXUS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
25 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in SMHC and 8,463 in VXUS, against full books of 54 and 9,293.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SMHC | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 688256:SHCambricon Technologies-A | 12.28% | 0.01% | 12.27% |
| 688041:SHHygon Information Technology Ltd A | 10.54% | 0.01% | 10.53% |
| 002371:SHNaura Technology Group Co. Ltd. Class A | 10.02% | 0.01% | 10.01% |
| 688012:SHAdvanced Micro-Fabrication Equipment Inc China - Class A Shares | 5.78% | 0.01% | 5.77% |
| 688008:SHMontage Technology Co Ltd-A | 5.25% | 0.00% | 5.25% |
| 603986:SHGigadevice Semiconductor Beiji | 5.06% | 0.01% | 5.05% |
| 002463:SHWus Printed Circuit Kunsha-A | 4.88% | 0.00% | 4.88% |
| 1347:HKHua Hong Semiconductor Ltd | 4.57% | 0.02% | 4.55% |
| 300476:SHVictory Giant Technology -A | 3.52% | 0.00% | 3.52% |
| 002938:SHAvary Holding Shenzhen Co -A | 3.49% | 0.00% | 3.49% |
98.7% of SMHC is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SMHC or VXUS?
SMHC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between SMHC and VXUS?
At least 98.7% of SMHC's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 25 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in SMHC and 8,463 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, SMHC or VXUS?
SMHC yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.38%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than SMHC?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.