SMRZ vs VOO
Global X Small Modular Reactor ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SMRZ or VOO?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 98.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SMRZ | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | - | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.05% |
| Holdings | 11 | 519 |
| YTD Return | -13.99% | +12.11%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +12.50% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.93% |
| Top 10 Weight | 98.0% | 39.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
SMRZ vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SMRZ vs VOO Performance
Global X Small Modular Reactor ETF (SMRZ) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, SMRZ is down 13.99% versus a gain of 12.11% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SMRZ charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SMRZ currently yields 0.00% against 1.05% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
6.9% of SMRZ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.4% of VOO's money is in holdings SMRZ also owns.
SMRZ and VOO share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 11 positions we hold weights for in SMRZ and 506 in VOO, against full books of 11 and 519.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 500 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SMRZ (99.6% of the fund), and 9 for SMRZ that do not appear in VOO (90.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SMRZ | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEVGe Vernova | 6.88% | 0.38% | 6.50% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SMRZ and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SMRZ or VOO?
SMRZ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between SMRZ and VOO?
6.9% of SMRZ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.4% of VOO's is in holdings SMRZ also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 11 positions we hold weights for in SMRZ and 506 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, SMRZ or VOO?
SMRZ yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.05%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SMRZ?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 98.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.