SOXQ vs VTI
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SOXQ or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SOXQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SOXQ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3.2B | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.31% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 66 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +79.89%Best | +14.72% |
| 1Y Return | +95.86%Best | +16.82% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +57.28%Best | +22.93% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +33.60%Best | +12.78% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.8% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -46.0% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $42,563Best | $18,246 |
| Top 10 Weight | 62.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 11, 2021 to Oct 6, 2026 (5.3 years).
SOXQ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
SOXQ vs VTI Performance
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SOXQ returned +95.86% while VTI returned +16.82%. Year to date, SOXQ is up 79.89% versus a gain of 14.72% for VTI.
Over three years, SOXQ compounded at +57.28% per year against +22.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +33.60% and +12.78% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SOXQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.8% compared with 15.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.0% for SOXQ and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SOXQ charges 0.19% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SOXQ currently yields 0.31% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
85.2% of SOXQ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 14.8% of VTI's money is in holdings SOXQ also owns.
Most of SOXQ is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, SOXQ as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
24 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in SOXQ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 66 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,127 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SOXQ (82.7% of the fund), and 4 for SOXQ that do not appear in VTI (5.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SOXQ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 13.60% | 6.40% | 7.20% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 8.87% | 2.56% | 6.31% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 8.80% | 1.29% | 7.51% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.38% | 1.08% | 3.30% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd. | 5.04% | 0.23% | 4.81% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 4.44% | 0.56% | 3.88% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 4.10% | 0.51% | 3.59% |
| KLACKla Corp | 4.12% | 0.33% | 3.79% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 3.93% | 0.50% | 3.43% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 4.02% | 0.25% | 3.77% |
85.2% of SOXQ is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SOXQ or VTI?
SOXQ has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SOXQ or VTI?
Over the past year SOXQ returned +95.86% vs +16.82% for VTI, so SOXQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SOXQ or VTI?
SOXQ has been the more volatile fund at 35.8% annualized versus 15.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SOXQ -46.0% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both SOXQ and VTI?
SOXQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SOXQ and VTI?
85.2% of SOXQ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 14.8% of VTI's is in holdings SOXQ also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in SOXQ and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SOXQ or VTI?
SOXQ yields 0.31% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SOXQ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SOXQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.