SPY vs XLC
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust vs State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF
Quick Verdict
XLC has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPY | XLC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.08% | |
| AUM | $789.1B | $21.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.01% | 1.21% | |
| Holdings | 505 | 26 | |
| YTD Return | +14.47% | -3.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.96% | +2.57% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.70% | +19.87% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.30% | +7.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 19.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -46.6% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 22, 1993 | Jun 18, 2018 |
SPY vs XLC Performance
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLC) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year SPY returned +21.96% while XLC returned +2.57%. Year to date, SPY is up 14.47% versus a loss of 3.16% for XLC.
Over three years, SPY compounded at +21.70% per year against +19.87% for XLC; over five years the annualized figures are +13.30% and +7.33% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, XLC has the edge at +11.23% annualized vs +8.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XLC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.0% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for SPY and -46.6% for XLC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPY charges 0.09% per year while XLC charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $8 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPY currently yields 1.01% against 1.21% for XLC.
Holdings Overlap
SPY and XLC share 23 holdings out of 504 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPY or XLC?
SPY has an expense ratio of 0.09% while XLC charges 0.08%. XLC is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SPY or XLC?
Over the past year SPY returned +21.96% vs +2.57% for XLC, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), SPY annualized +8.87% vs +11.23% for XLC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SPY or XLC?
XLC has been the more volatile fund at 19.0% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: SPY -56.5% vs XLC -46.6%.
Should I hold both SPY and XLC?
SPY and XLC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SPY and XLC?
SPY and XLC share 23 common holdings with a 10.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 504 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPY or XLC?
SPY yields 1.01% while XLC yields 1.21%, so XLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.