SPY vs XLK
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust vs State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
Quick Verdict
XLK has a lower expense ratio. XLK delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPY | XLK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.08% | |
| AUM | $821.1B | $124.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.01% | 0.45% | |
| Holdings | 505 | 77 | |
| YTD Return | +12.68% | +27.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.82% | +42.34% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.98% | +30.61% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.89% | +19.29% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 23.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -82.0% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 22, 1993 | Dec 16, 1998 |
SPY vs XLK Performance
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year SPY returned +21.82% while XLK returned +42.34%. Year to date, SPY is up 12.68% versus a gain of 27.34% for XLK.
Over three years, SPY compounded at +21.98% per year against +30.61% for XLK; over five years the annualized figures are +12.89% and +19.29% respectively. Across the full 28-year window we track, XLK has the edge at +9.37% annualized vs +8.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XLK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.2% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for SPY and -82.0% for XLK. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPY charges 0.09% per year while XLK charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $8 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPY currently yields 1.01% against 0.45% for XLK.
Holdings Overlap
SPY and XLK share 74 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 37.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPY or XLK?
SPY has an expense ratio of 0.09% while XLK charges 0.08%. XLK is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SPY or XLK?
Over the past year SPY returned +21.82% vs +42.34% for XLK, so XLK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (28 years), SPY annualized +8.81% vs +9.37% for XLK. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SPY or XLK?
XLK has been the more volatile fund at 23.2% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: SPY -56.5% vs XLK -82.0%.
Should I hold both SPY and XLK?
SPY and XLK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SPY and XLK?
SPY and XLK share 74 common holdings with a 37.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPY or XLK?
SPY yields 1.01% while XLK yields 0.45%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.