SRET vs VOO
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SRET or VOO?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRET | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $228M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.27% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 34 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +3.51% | +12.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.27% | +18.60%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.56% | +20.98%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.86% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.3% | 15.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -67.7% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,965 | $18,230Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.4% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 16, 2015 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 17, 2015 to Sep 9, 2026 (11.5 years).
SRET vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.5 years both funds cover.
SRET vs VOO Performance
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRET returned +6.27% while VOO returned +18.60%. Year to date, SRET is up 3.51% versus a gain of 12.23% for VOO.
Over three years, SRET compounded at +9.56% per year against +20.98% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +1.86% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +12.76% annualized vs -2.66%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.3% compared with 15.0% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.7% for SRET and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRET charges 0.58% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRET currently yields 8.27% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
3.4% of SRET's money is in holdings VOO also owns.
SRET and VOO share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in SRET and 505 in VOO, against full books of 34 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 495 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SRET (99.4% of the fund), and 24 for SRET that do not appear in VOO (85.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SRET | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VICIVici Properties Inc | 3.41% | 0.04% | 3.37% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SRET and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRET or VOO?
SRET has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SRET or VOO?
Over the past year SRET returned +6.27% vs +18.60% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), SRET annualized -2.66% vs +12.76% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SRET or VOO?
SRET has been the more volatile fund at 22.3% annualized versus 15.0% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SRET -67.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SRET and VOO?
SRET and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SRET and VOO?
3.4% of SRET's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.0% of VOO's is in holdings SRET also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in SRET and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRET or VOO?
SRET yields 8.27% while VOO yields 1.04%, so SRET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SRET?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.