SRET vs VTI
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRET | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $230M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.87% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +7.09% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.24% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.83% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.92% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -67.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 16, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
SRET vs VTI Performance
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRET returned +13.24% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, SRET is up 7.09% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, SRET compounded at +11.83% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.92% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs -2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.7% for SRET and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRET charges 0.58% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRET currently yields 7.87% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SRET and VTI share 10 holdings out of 2800 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRET or VTI?
SRET has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SRET or VTI?
Over the past year SRET returned +13.24% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), SRET annualized -2.38% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SRET or VTI?
SRET has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SRET -67.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SRET and VTI?
SRET and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SRET and VTI?
SRET and VTI share 10 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2800 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRET or VTI?
SRET yields 7.87% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SRET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.