SRET vs VTI
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SRET or VTI?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRET | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $213M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.27% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 66 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -4.78% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.68% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.23% | +23.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.65% | +12.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.4% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -67.7% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,329 | $18,286Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.1% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 16, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 17, 2015 to Oct 2, 2026 (11.5 years).
SRET vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.5 years both funds cover.
SRET vs VTI Performance
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRET returned -1.68% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, SRET is down 4.78% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, SRET compounded at +10.23% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.65% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.23% annualized vs -3.35%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.7% for SRET and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRET charges 0.58% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRET currently yields 8.27% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
83.6% of SRET's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's money is in holdings SRET also owns.
Most of SRET is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, SRET as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
23 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in SRET and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 66 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,138 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SRET (97.3% of the fund), and 2 for SRET that do not appear in VTI (6.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SRET | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| APLEApple Hospitality Reit Inc | 4.88% | 0.00% | 4.88% |
| LTCLtc Properties Inc | 4.48% | 0.00% | 4.48% |
| HRHealthcare Realty Trust Incorporated | 4.26% | 0.01% | 4.25% |
| GTYGetty Realty Corp | 4.26% | 0.00% | 4.26% |
| BNLBroadstone Net Lease, Inc. | 4.24% | 0.01% | 4.23% |
| EPREpr Properties | 4.23% | 0.01% | 4.22% |
| SBRASabra Health Care Reit, Inc. | 4.22% | 0.01% | 4.21% |
| OHIOmega Healthcare Investors Reit In | 4.14% | 0.02% | 4.12% |
| KRCKrc Kilroy Realty Corp. | 3.77% | 0.01% | 3.76% |
| EFCEllington Financial Inc | 3.59% | 0.00% | 3.59% |
83.6% of SRET is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRET or VTI?
SRET has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SRET or VTI?
Over the past year SRET returned -1.68% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), SRET annualized -3.35% vs +12.23% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SRET or VTI?
SRET has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SRET -67.7% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both SRET and VTI?
SRET and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SRET and VTI?
83.6% of SRET's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's is in holdings SRET also owns. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in SRET and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRET or VTI?
SRET yields 8.27% while VTI yields 1.03%, so SRET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SRET?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.