SRHQ vs VTI
SRH US Quality GARP ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SRHQ or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SRHQ led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. SRHQ is less concentrated, with 18.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRHQ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $219M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 82 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +18.53%Best | +13.60% |
| 1Y Return | +23.80%Best | +18.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.20% | +23.04%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 13.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.5%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 4 years | $18,958 | $21,210Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 18.9%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | SRH Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 4, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 5, 2022 to Sep 25, 2026 (4 years).
SRHQ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4 years both funds cover.
SRHQ vs VTI Performance
SRH US Quality GARP ETF (SRHQ) is an ETF from SRH Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRHQ returned +23.80% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, SRHQ is up 18.53% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Over three years, SRHQ compounded at +19.20% per year against +23.04% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +20.68% annualized vs +17.34%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRHQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.8% compared with 13.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.5% for SRHQ and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRHQ charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRHQ currently yields 0.69% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.3% of SRHQ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 3.6% of VTI's money is in holdings SRHQ also owns.
Most of SRHQ is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
78 positions in common, counted across the 81 positions we hold weights for in SRHQ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 82 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 81 and 3,463 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 1,078 positions SRHQ does not, 93.9% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 6.40%, AAPL 6.29%, MSFT 4.79%, AMZN 3.65%, GOOGL 2.90%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SRHQ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HUMHumana Inc. | 2.45% | 0.06% | 2.39% |
| CNCCentene | 2.18% | 0.04% | 2.14% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 1.57% | 0.52% | 1.05% |
| QLYSQualys Inc | 2.06% | 0.01% | 2.05% |
| NSPInsperity Inc | 1.98% | 0.00% | 1.98% |
| NTNXNutanix Inc - A | 1.86% | 0.02% | 1.84% |
| CVLTCommvaultsystems Inc. | 1.79% | 0.01% | 1.78% |
| GENGen Digital Inc | 1.73% | 0.02% | 1.71% |
| WDAYWorkday, Inc., Class A | 1.64% | 0.04% | 1.60% |
| FTDRFrontdoor Inc | 1.63% | 0.01% | 1.62% |
98.3% of SRHQ is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRHQ or VTI?
SRHQ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SRHQ or VTI?
Over the past year SRHQ returned +23.80% vs +18.17% for VTI, so SRHQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SRHQ annualized +17.34% vs +20.68% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SRHQ or VTI?
SRHQ has been the more volatile fund at 13.8% annualized versus 13.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SRHQ -18.5% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both SRHQ and VTI?
SRHQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SRHQ and VTI?
98.3% of SRHQ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 3.6% of VTI's is in holdings SRHQ also owns. They hold 78 positions in common, counted across the 81 positions we hold weights for in SRHQ and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRHQ or VTI?
SRHQ yields 0.69% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SRHQ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SRHQ led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. SRHQ is less concentrated, with 18.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.