SRHQ vs VTI
SRH US Quality GARP ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SRHQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRHQ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $224M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 80 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +26.14% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.57% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.62% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | SRH Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 4, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
SRHQ vs VTI Performance
SRH US Quality GARP ETF (SRHQ) is a ETF from SRH Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRHQ returned +33.57% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, SRHQ is up 26.14% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, SRHQ compounded at +20.62% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, SRHQ has the edge at +19.71% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.5% for SRHQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.5% for SRHQ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRHQ charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRHQ currently yields 0.69% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SRHQ and VTI share 65 holdings out of 2803 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRHQ or VTI?
SRHQ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SRHQ or VTI?
Over the past year SRHQ returned +33.57% vs +22.35% for VTI, so SRHQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SRHQ annualized +19.71% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SRHQ or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.5% for SRHQ. Worst drawdown: SRHQ -18.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SRHQ and VTI?
SRHQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SRHQ and VTI?
SRHQ and VTI share 65 common holdings with a 3.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2803 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRHQ or VTI?
SRHQ yields 0.69% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.