SSXU vs VTI
Day Hagan Smart Sector International ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SSXU | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.22% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $45M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.56% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 14 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +5.44% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.66% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.06% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Day Hagan Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 1, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
SSXU vs VTI Performance
Day Hagan Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) is a ETF from Day Hagan Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SSXU returned +14.66% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, SSXU is up 5.44% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, SSXU compounded at +14.06% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, SSXU has the edge at +11.91% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.6% for SSXU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.9% for SSXU and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SSXU charges 1.22% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $122 vs $3 annually, a gap of $119 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SSXU currently yields 2.56% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SSXU and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2806 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SSXU or VTI?
SSXU has an expense ratio of 1.22% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $119 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SSXU or VTI?
Over the past year SSXU returned +14.66% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SSXU annualized +11.91% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SSXU or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.6% for SSXU. Worst drawdown: SSXU -13.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SSXU and VTI?
SSXU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SSXU and VTI?
SSXU and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2806 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SSXU or VTI?
SSXU yields 2.56% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SSXU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.