SSXU vs VTI
Day Hagan Smart Sector International ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SSXU or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SSXU | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.22% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $46M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.56% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 20 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +4.69% | +12.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.95% | +17.22%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | +20.87%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5%Best | 14.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.9%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 4.2 years | $15,826 | $20,896Best |
| Fund Family | Day Hagan Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 1, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2022 to Sep 11, 2026 (4.2 years).
SSXU vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.2 years both funds cover.
SSXU vs VTI Performance
Day Hagan Smart Sector International ETF (SSXU) is an ETF from Day Hagan Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SSXU returned +9.95% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, SSXU is up 4.69% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Over three years, SSXU compounded at +13.37% per year against +20.87% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +19.18% annualized vs +11.55%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.5% for SSXU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.9% for SSXU and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SSXU charges 1.22% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $122 vs $3 annually, a gap of $119 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SSXU currently yields 2.56% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 19 holdings in SSXU and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 99.8% and 90.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 19 positions we hold weights for in SSXU and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 20 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 19 and 2,787 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 681 positions SSXU does not, 89.9% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 6.32%, AAPL 5.84%, MSFT 3.81%, AMZN 3.17%, GOOGL 2.88%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SSXU and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SSXU or VTI?
SSXU has an expense ratio of 1.22% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $119 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SSXU or VTI?
Over the past year SSXU returned +9.95% vs +17.22% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SSXU annualized +11.55% vs +19.18% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SSXU or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.5% for SSXU. Worst drawdown: SSXU -13.9% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both SSXU and VTI?
SSXU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SSXU or VTI?
SSXU yields 2.56% while VTI yields 1.03%, so SSXU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SSXU?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.