STRV vs VXUS

STRV vs VXUS

Which is better, STRV or VXUS?

STRV has been ahead.

STRV led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: STRV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSTRVVXUS
Expense Ratio0.05%Tie0.05%Tie
AUM$1.1B$158.1B
Dividend Yield1.05%2.51%
Holdings5078,747
Volatility (annualized)13.8%Best14.3%
Max Drawdown-19.0%-13.6%Best
$10,000 over 3.7 years$20,066Best$18,734
Fund FamilyStrive Asset ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 15, 2022Jan 26, 2011

Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

The two price series end 102 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. STRV has data through Jun 5, 2026 and VXUS through Sep 15, 2026.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2022 to Jun 5, 2026 (3.7 years).

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 13.8% for STRV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.0% for STRV and -13.6% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

STRV charges 0.05% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $5 annually. On income, STRV currently yields 1.05% against 2.51% for VXUS.

Holdings Overlap

STRV already in VXUS0.4%

At least 0.4% of STRV's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.

Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 88.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.

The two holdings books were reported 122 days apart, STRV as of Mar 31, 2026 and VXUS as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

6 positions in common, counted across the 496 positions we hold weights for in STRV and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 507 and 8,747.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in STRVWeight in VXUSDifference
MKLMarkel Group Inc0.04%0.76%0.72%
SRESempra Common Stock0.11%0.00%0.11%
HBANHuntington Bancshares Inc./Oh0.06%0.05%0.01%
HALHalliburton Co.0.06%0.02%0.04%
KRKroger Co.0.07%0.00%0.07%
EFX:CAEnerflex Ltd0.04%0.01%0.03%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of STRV and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

STRVVXUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, STRV or VXUS?

STRV has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VXUS charges 0.05%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which is riskier, STRV or VXUS?

VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 13.8% for STRV. Worst drawdown: STRV -19.0% vs VXUS -13.6%.

Should I hold both STRV and VXUS?

STRV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, STRV or VXUS?

STRV yields 1.05% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VXUS better than STRV?

STRV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.