THNQ vs VXUS
Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. THNQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | THNQ | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $411M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.15% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +40.61% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +61.43% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +36.98% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.85% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Robo Global | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 8, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
THNQ vs VXUS Performance
Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) is a ETF from Robo Global and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year THNQ returned +61.43% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, THNQ is up 40.61% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, THNQ compounded at +36.98% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +15.85% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, THNQ has the edge at +22.72% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
THNQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.9% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.6% for THNQ and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
THNQ charges 0.68% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $5 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, THNQ currently yields 0.15% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
THNQ and VXUS share 7 holdings out of 7907 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, THNQ or VXUS?
THNQ has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, THNQ or VXUS?
Over the past year THNQ returned +61.43% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so THNQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), THNQ annualized +22.72% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, THNQ or VXUS?
THNQ has been the more volatile fund at 26.9% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: THNQ -50.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both THNQ and VXUS?
THNQ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between THNQ and VXUS?
THNQ and VXUS share 7 common holdings with a 3.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7907 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, THNQ or VXUS?
THNQ yields 0.15% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.