IVV vs THNQ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. THNQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | THNQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.68% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $463M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.16% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 54 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | +45.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +64.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | +39.44% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | +17.32% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 27.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -50.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Robo Global | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 8, 2020 |
IVV vs THNQ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) is a ETF from Robo Global. Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% while THNQ returned +64.27%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.29% versus a gain of 45.64% for THNQ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.19% per year against +39.44% for THNQ; over five years the annualized figures are +13.28% and +17.32% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, THNQ has the edge at +23.33% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
THNQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -50.6% for THNQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while THNQ charges 0.68%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $68 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.16% for THNQ.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and THNQ share 22 holdings out of 536 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or THNQ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while THNQ charges 0.68%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or THNQ?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% vs +64.27% for THNQ, so THNQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IVV annualized +7.06% vs +23.33% for THNQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or THNQ?
THNQ has been the more volatile fund at 27.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs THNQ -50.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and THNQ?
IVV and THNQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and THNQ?
IVV and THNQ share 22 common holdings with a 16.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 536 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or THNQ?
IVV yields 1.10% while THNQ yields 0.16%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.