THNQ vs VOO
Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, THNQ or VOO?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. THNQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. THNQ is less concentrated, with 24.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | THNQ | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $436M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.14% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 54 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +52.06%Best | +13.21% |
| 1Y Return | +52.15%Best | +17.37% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +42.56%Best | +22.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.99%Best | +13.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.9% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -50.6% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $21,915Best | $18,539 |
| Top 10 Weight | 24.9%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Robo Global | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 8, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 11, 2020 to Sep 24, 2026 (6.4 years).
THNQ vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.4 years both funds cover.
THNQ vs VOO Performance
Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) is an ETF from Robo Global and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year THNQ returned +52.15% while VOO returned +17.37%. Year to date, THNQ is up 52.06% versus a gain of 13.21% for VOO.
Over three years, THNQ compounded at +42.56% per year against +22.66% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +16.99% and +13.14% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, THNQ has the edge at +23.71% annualized vs +17.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
THNQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.9% compared with 15.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.6% for THNQ and -24.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
THNQ charges 0.68% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, THNQ currently yields 0.14% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
44.0% of THNQ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 28.1% of VOO's money is in holdings THNQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
23 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in THNQ and 494 in VOO, against full books of 54 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 464 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for THNQ (71.1% of the fund), and 20 for THNQ that do not appear in VOO (36.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in THNQ | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.08% | 7.55% | 5.47% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.15% | 5.36% | 3.21% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.16% | 4.13% | 1.97% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 1.98% | 3.24% | 1.26% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.99% | 1.90% | 0.09% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.02% | 1.21% | 0.81% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 2.78% | 0.42% | 2.36% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 2.55% | 0.30% | 2.25% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.44% | 1.36% | 0.08% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 2.29% | 0.29% | 2.00% |
44.0% of THNQ is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, THNQ or VOO?
THNQ has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, THNQ or VOO?
Over the past year THNQ returned +52.15% vs +17.37% for VOO, so THNQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), THNQ annualized +23.71% vs +17.82% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, THNQ or VOO?
THNQ has been the more volatile fund at 26.9% annualized versus 15.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: THNQ -50.6% vs VOO -24.5%.
Should I hold both THNQ and VOO?
THNQ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between THNQ and VOO?
44.0% of THNQ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 28.1% of VOO's is in holdings THNQ also owns. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in THNQ and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, THNQ or VOO?
THNQ yields 0.14% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than THNQ?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. THNQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. THNQ is less concentrated, with 24.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.