THNQ vs VOO
Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. THNQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | THNQ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $411M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.15% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +43.99% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +63.07% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +38.24% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.68% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Robo Global | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 8, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
THNQ vs VOO Performance
Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) is a ETF from Robo Global and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year THNQ returned +63.07% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, THNQ is up 43.99% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, THNQ compounded at +38.24% per year against +21.55% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +16.68% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, THNQ has the edge at +23.13% annualized vs +13.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
THNQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.6% for THNQ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
THNQ charges 0.68% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, THNQ currently yields 0.15% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
THNQ and VOO share 23 holdings out of 535 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, THNQ or VOO?
THNQ has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, THNQ or VOO?
Over the past year THNQ returned +63.07% vs +21.63% for VOO, so THNQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), THNQ annualized +23.13% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, THNQ or VOO?
THNQ has been the more volatile fund at 27.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: THNQ -50.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both THNQ and VOO?
THNQ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between THNQ and VOO?
THNQ and VOO share 23 common holdings with a 16.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 535 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, THNQ or VOO?
THNQ yields 0.15% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.