TILL vs VTI

TILL vs VTI

Which is better, TILL or VTI?

Agriculture against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. TILL led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTILLVTI
Expense Ratio0.89%0.03%Best
AUM$44M$666.9B
Dividend Yield4.00%1.03%
Holdings63,543
YTD Return+22.50%Best+12.30%
1Y Return+18.71%Best+16.08%
3Y Return (annualized)-2.01%+21.01%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.36%
Volatility (annualized)13.1%Best15.5%
Max Drawdown-33.8%-19.3%Best
$10,000 over 4.3 years$8,178$19,413Best
Fund FamilyTeucriumVanguard (US)
CategoryCommodityEquity
StyleAgricultureLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 16, 2022May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 17, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.3 years).

TILL vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.3 years both funds cover.

TILL vs VTI Performance

Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) is an ETF from Teucrium and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TILL returned +18.71% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, TILL is up 22.50% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.

Over three years, TILL compounded at -2.01% per year against +21.01% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +16.68% annualized vs -4.57%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 13.1% for TILL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.8% for TILL and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.05. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TILL charges 0.89% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TILL currently yields 4.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of TILL and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

TILLVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TILL or VTI?

TILL has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, TILL or VTI?

Over the past year TILL returned +18.71% vs +16.08% for VTI, so TILL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), TILL annualized -4.57% vs +16.68% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, TILL or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 13.1% for TILL. Worst drawdown: TILL -33.8% vs VTI -19.3%.

Should I hold both TILL and VTI?

TILL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.05, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, TILL or VTI?

TILL yields 4.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so TILL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than TILL?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. TILL led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.