TOPW vs VOO

TOPW vs VOO

Which is better, TOPW or VOO?

Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. TOPW led over the full window, VOO over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 95.9%.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTOPWVOO
Expense Ratio0.32%0.03%Best
AUM$143M$997.4B
Dividend Yield54.15%1.04%
Holdings13509
YTD Return-0.33%+12.67%Best
1Y Return-0.33%+16.35%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.92%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.55%
Volatility (annualized)-12.2%
Max Drawdown-45.2%-12.0%Best
$10,000 over 1.5 years$90,323Best$13,793
Top 10 Weight95.9%37.6%Best
Fund FamilyRoundhill InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleOption WritingLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 4, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 2, 2025 to Sep 28, 2026 (1.5 years).

TOPW vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

TOPW vs VOO Performance

Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TOPW returned -0.33% while VOO returned +16.35%. Year to date, TOPW is down 0.33% versus a gain of 12.67% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.2% for TOPW and -12.0% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TOPW charges 0.32% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $3 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TOPW currently yields 54.15% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 12 holdings in TOPW and 494 in VOO, totalling 100.0% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 12 positions we hold weights for in TOPW and 494 in VOO, against full books of 13 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Measured across the 12 and 494 positions we hold weights for.

VOO holds 487 positions TOPW does not, 99.2% of the fund.

Largest: NVDA 7.55%, AAPL 7.05%, MSFT 5.36%, AMZN 4.13%, GOOGL 3.24%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of TOPW and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

TOPWVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TOPW or VOO?

TOPW has an expense ratio of 0.32% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, TOPW or VOO?

Over the past year TOPW returned -0.33% vs +16.35% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), TOPW annualized +333.71% vs +23.91% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, TOPW or VOO?

TOPW yields 54.15% while VOO yields 1.04%, so TOPW currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than TOPW?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. TOPW led over the full window, VOO over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 95.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.