TOPW vs VXUS
Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, TOPW or VXUS?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. TOPW led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TOPW | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $143M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 54.15% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 13 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | -0.12% | +12.88%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.12% | +19.97%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.14% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.87% |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 12.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -45.2% | -11.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $92,380Best | $14,346 |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 4, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 2, 2025 to Sep 23, 2026 (1.5 years).
TOPW vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
TOPW vs VXUS Performance
Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TOPW returned -0.12% while VXUS returned +19.97%. Year to date, TOPW is down 0.12% versus a gain of 12.88% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.2% for TOPW and -11.3% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TOPW charges 0.32% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $5 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TOPW currently yields 54.15% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 12 holdings in TOPW and 8,082 in VXUS, totalling 100.0% and 88.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 12 positions we hold weights for in TOPW and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 13 and 8,747.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 12 and 8,082 positions we hold weights for.
VXUS holds 35 positions TOPW does not, 2.3% of the fund.
Largest: MKL 0.76%, SHEL 0.57%, VWO 0.11%, JD 0.09%, ALC 0.08%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of TOPW and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TOPW or VXUS?
TOPW has an expense ratio of 0.32% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TOPW or VXUS?
Over the past year TOPW returned -0.12% vs +19.97% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), TOPW annualized +340.27% vs +27.20% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, TOPW or VXUS?
TOPW yields 54.15% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so TOPW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than TOPW?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. TOPW led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.