USNG vs VTI
Amplify Samsung US Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, USNG or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. USNG led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | USNG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $10M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.52% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 27 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +27.98%Best | +12.30% |
| 1Y Return | +31.18%Best | +16.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -11.9% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $14,347Best | $12,973 |
| Top 10 Weight | 62.7% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 20, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 20, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.3 years).
USNG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
USNG vs VTI Performance
Amplify Samsung US Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year USNG returned +31.18% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, USNG is up 27.98% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
USNG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 11.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.9% for USNG and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.27. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
USNG charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, USNG currently yields 1.52% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
60.1% of USNG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.8% of VTI's money is in holdings USNG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in USNG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 27 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,136 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for USNG (96.6% of the fund), and 6 for USNG that do not appear in VTI (27.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in USNG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 8.73% | 0.12% | 8.61% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 7.48% | 0.08% | 7.40% |
| SEISolaris Oilfield Infrastructure In | 7.50% | 0.00% | 7.50% |
| BECfd Bloom Energy Corp- A | 6.76% | 0.08% | 6.68% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 4.17% | 0.08% | 4.09% |
| DTMDT Midstream Inc | 3.80% | 0.02% | 3.78% |
| AROCArchrock, Inc. | 3.31% | 0.01% | 3.30% |
| KGSKodiak Gas Services Inccommon Stock | 3.24% | 0.01% | 3.23% |
| VSTVistra Energy Corp. | 2.67% | 0.07% | 2.60% |
| LNGCheniere Energy Inc. | 2.62% | 0.08% | 2.54% |
60.1% of USNG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, USNG or VTI?
USNG has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, USNG or VTI?
Over the past year USNG returned +31.18% vs +16.08% for VTI, so USNG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), USNG annualized +32.00% vs +22.17% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, USNG or VTI?
USNG has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 11.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: USNG -11.9% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both USNG and VTI?
USNG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.27, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between USNG and VTI?
60.1% of USNG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.8% of VTI's is in holdings USNG also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in USNG and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, USNG or VTI?
USNG yields 1.52% while VTI yields 1.03%, so USNG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than USNG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. USNG led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.