USNG vs VTI
Amplify Samsung US Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. USNG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | USNG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.43% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +25.57% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.05% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 20, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
USNG vs VTI Performance
Amplify Samsung US Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year USNG returned +35.05% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, USNG is up 25.57% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
USNG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.9% for USNG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
USNG charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, USNG currently yields 1.43% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
USNG and VTI share 17 holdings out of 2792 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, USNG or VTI?
USNG has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, USNG or VTI?
Over the past year USNG returned +35.05% vs +22.39% for VTI, so USNG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), USNG annualized +32.90% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, USNG or VTI?
USNG has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: USNG -11.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both USNG and VTI?
USNG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between USNG and VTI?
USNG and VTI share 17 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2792 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, USNG or VTI?
USNG yields 1.43% while VTI yields 1.07%, so USNG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.