UXJA vs VOO
UXJA vs VOO
FT Vest US Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. UXJA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UXJA | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $11M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +14.54% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.86% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 17, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
UXJA vs VOO Performance
FT Vest US Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UXJA returned +24.86% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, UXJA is up 14.54% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UXJA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.0% for UXJA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UXJA charges 0.85% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UXJA currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
UXJA and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UXJA or VOO?
UXJA has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, UXJA or VOO?
Over the past year UXJA returned +24.86% vs +23.71% for VOO, so UXJA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), UXJA annualized +18.83% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, UXJA or VOO?
UXJA has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: UXJA -20.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both UXJA and VOO?
UXJA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between UXJA and VOO?
UXJA and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, UXJA or VOO?
UXJA yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.