UYM vs VTI
ProShares Ultra Materials vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. UYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UYM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $42M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.19% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +21.88% | +12.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.32% | +20.11% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.47% | +20.52% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.62% | +11.49% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 45.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -92.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
UYM vs VTI Performance
ProShares Ultra Materials (UYM) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UYM returned +22.32% while VTI returned +20.11%. Year to date, UYM is up 21.88% versus a gain of 12.23% for VTI.
Over three years, UYM compounded at +10.47% per year against +20.52% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.62% and +11.49% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.04% annualized vs +2.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 45.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -92.8% for UYM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UYM charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UYM currently yields 1.19% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
UYM and VTI share 21 holdings out of 2792 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UYM or VTI?
UYM has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, UYM or VTI?
Over the past year UYM returned +22.32% vs +20.11% for VTI, so UYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), UYM annualized +2.92% vs +8.04% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, UYM or VTI?
UYM has been the more volatile fund at 45.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: UYM -92.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both UYM and VTI?
UYM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between UYM and VTI?
UYM and VTI share 21 common holdings with a 1.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2792 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, UYM or VTI?
UYM yields 1.19% while VTI yields 1.07%, so UYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.