UYM vs VOO
ProShares Ultra Materials vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, UYM or VOO?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. UYM led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UYM | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $40M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 31 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +13.84%Best | +13.31% |
| 1Y Return | +17.51%Best | +17.07% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.72% | +22.72%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.20% | +13.19%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 40.1% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -73.9% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,509 | $18,580Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 23, 2026 (16 years).
UYM vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
UYM vs VOO Performance
ProShares Ultra Materials (UYM) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UYM returned +17.51% while VOO returned +17.07%. Year to date, UYM is up 13.84% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.
Over three years, UYM compounded at +10.72% per year against +22.72% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +6.20% and +13.19% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.43% annualized vs +8.54%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 40.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.9% for UYM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UYM charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UYM currently yields 1.09% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.8% of VOO's money is in holdings UYM also owns.
Stated as a floor: for UYM, our book for it covers 69.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VOO and UYM share little of their money.
25 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in UYM and 494 in VOO, against full books of 31 and 509.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in UYM | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 9.14% | 0.34% | 8.80% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 5.44% | 0.16% | 5.28% |
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 4.40% | 0.14% | 4.26% |
| CTVACorteva Inc Ctva | 3.41% | 0.08% | 3.33% |
| SHWSherwin Williams Co/the | 3.35% | 0.12% | 3.23% |
| APDAir Products & Chemicals Inc. | 3.36% | 0.10% | 3.26% |
| ECLEcolab, Inc. | 3.31% | 0.11% | 3.20% |
| NUENucor Corp. | 2.99% | 0.09% | 2.90% |
| VMCVulcan Materials Co. | 2.97% | 0.05% | 2.92% |
| CRH:LNCrh Plc - Common | 2.83% | 0.10% | 2.73% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of UYM and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UYM or VOO?
UYM has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, UYM or VOO?
Over the past year UYM returned +17.51% vs +17.07% for VOO, so UYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), UYM annualized +8.54% vs +13.43% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, UYM or VOO?
UYM has been the more volatile fund at 40.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: UYM -73.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both UYM and VOO?
UYM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between UYM and VOO?
At least 1.8% of VOO's money is in holdings UYM also owns. Our book for UYM is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 25 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in UYM and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, UYM or VOO?
UYM yields 1.09% while VOO yields 1.04%, so UYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than UYM?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. UYM led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.