VB vs VXF

Quick Verdict

VB has a lower expense ratio. VB delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXF offers more diversification with 2462 holdings.

Lower Fees: VBHigher Returns: VBMore Diversified: VXF

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVBVXFWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.05%
AUM$81.5B$31.6B
Dividend Yield1.48%1.21%
Holdings1,3243,376
YTD Return+17.82%+17.50%
1Y Return+29.09%+26.88%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.24%+18.92%
5Y Return (annualized)+8.18%+6.95%
Volatility (annualized)18.9%18.7%
Max Drawdown-61.0%-59.4%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJan 26, 2004Dec 27, 2001

VB vs VXF Performance

Vanguard Small Cap ETF (VB) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VB returned +29.09% while VXF returned +26.88%. Year to date, VB is up 17.82% versus a gain of 17.50% for VXF.

Over three years, VB compounded at +16.24% per year against +18.92% for VXF; over five years the annualized figures are +8.18% and +6.95% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, VXF has the edge at +9.09% annualized vs +8.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 18.7% for VXF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -61.0% for VB and -59.4% for VXF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VB charges 0.03% per year while VXF charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $5 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VB currently yields 1.48% against 1.21% for VXF.

Holdings Overlap

62.0%overlap

VB and VXF share 876 holdings out of 2698 unique holdings combined, representing a 62.0% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VBWeight in VXFDifference
LITE0.64%0.62%0.02%
COHR0.53%0.51%0.02%
RKLB0.48%0.41%0.07%
BEProProPro
NTRAProProPro
0RMV:LNProProPro
CASYProProPro
CWProProPro
RGLDProProPro
INSMProProPro
See all 10 holdings VB shares with VXF
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VB or VXF?

VB has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VXF charges 0.05%. VB is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.

Which performed better, VB or VXF?

Over the past year VB returned +29.09% vs +26.88% for VXF, so VB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), VB annualized +8.86% vs +9.09% for VXF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, VB or VXF?

VB has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 18.7% for VXF. Worst drawdown: VB -61.0% vs VXF -59.4%.

Should I hold both VB and VXF?

VB and VXF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between VB and VXF?

VB and VXF share 876 common holdings with a 62.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2698 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, VB or VXF?

VB yields 1.48% while VXF yields 1.21%, so VB currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →