VBK vs VOT

Quick Verdict

VBK delivered stronger 1-year returns. VBK offers more diversification with 542 holdings.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: VBKMore Diversified: VBK

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVBKVOTWinner
Expense Ratio0.05%0.05%
AUM$24.8B$19.9B
Dividend Yield0.57%0.65%
Holdings561136
YTD Return+17.71%+9.25%
1Y Return+29.45%+7.07%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.91%+15.11%
5Y Return (annualized)+5.29%+5.46%
Volatility (annualized)19.6%18.6%
Max Drawdown-59.4%-60.3%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJan 26, 2004Aug 17, 2006

VBK vs VOT Performance

Vanguard Small Cap Growth ETF (VBK) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VBK returned +29.45% while VOT returned +7.07%. Year to date, VBK is up 17.71% versus a gain of 9.25% for VOT.

Over three years, VBK compounded at +16.91% per year against +15.11% for VOT; over five years the annualized figures are +5.29% and +5.46% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VOT has the edge at +9.62% annualized vs +9.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VBK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 18.6% for VOT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.4% for VBK and -60.3% for VOT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VBK charges 0.05% per year while VOT charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $5 annually. On income, VBK currently yields 0.57% against 0.65% for VOT.

Holdings Overlap

3.1%overlap

VBK and VOT share 11 holdings out of 652 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.1% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VBKWeight in VOTDifference
ALAB1.02%0.82%0.20%
FLEX:SI0.41%0.65%0.24%
TPL0.35%0.28%0.07%
ASTSProProPro
FSLRProProPro
INSMProProPro
BURLProProPro
EQTProProPro
HUBBProProPro
TKOProProPro
See all 10 holdings VBK shares with VOT
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$99/yr Pro · 7-day refund

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VBK or VOT?

VBK has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VOT charges 0.05%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.

Which performed better, VBK or VOT?

Over the past year VBK returned +29.45% vs +7.07% for VOT, so VBK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), VBK annualized +9.41% vs +9.62% for VOT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, VBK or VOT?

VBK has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 18.6% for VOT. Worst drawdown: VBK -59.4% vs VOT -60.3%.

Should I hold both VBK and VOT?

VBK and VOT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between VBK and VOT?

VBK and VOT share 11 common holdings with a 3.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 652 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, VBK or VOT?

VBK yields 0.57% while VOT yields 0.65%, so VOT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

X-ray your whole portfolio
$99/yr7-day refund. ETFs, mutual funds, 401(k)s.
Get Pro →