VEA vs VTV
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF
Quick Verdict
VEA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VEA offers more diversification with 3,886 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VEA | VTV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $230.3B | $187.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.55% | 1.85% | |
| Holdings | 3,886 | 311 | |
| YTD Return | +14.89% | +17.37% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.50% | +25.21% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.44% | +19.01% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.74% | +12.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.7% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.9% | -61.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 20, 2007 | Jan 26, 2004 |
VEA vs VTV Performance
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF (VTV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VEA returned +27.50% while VTV returned +25.21%. Year to date, VEA is up 14.89% versus a gain of 17.37% for VTV.
Over three years, VEA compounded at +20.44% per year against +19.01% for VTV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.74% and +12.28% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTV has the edge at +7.55% annualized vs +3.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VEA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 14.5% for VTV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.9% for VEA and -61.3% for VTV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VEA charges 0.03% per year while VTV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, VEA currently yields 2.55% against 1.85% for VTV.
Holdings Overlap
VEA and VTV share 4 holdings out of 4048 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VEA or VTV?
VEA has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VTV charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VEA or VTV?
Over the past year VEA returned +27.50% vs +25.21% for VTV, so VEA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), VEA annualized +3.07% vs +7.55% for VTV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VEA or VTV?
VEA has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 14.5% for VTV. Worst drawdown: VEA -62.9% vs VTV -61.3%.
Should I hold both VEA and VTV?
VEA and VTV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VEA and VTV?
VEA and VTV share 4 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 4048 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VEA or VTV?
VEA yields 2.55% while VTV yields 1.85%, so VEA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.