VOO vs WDRN

VOO vs WDRN

Which is better, VOO or WDRN?

Large Cap Blend against All Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. WDRN is less concentrated, with 34.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: WDRN

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVOOWDRN
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.45%
AUM$997.4B$21M
Dividend Yield1.04%0.00%
Holdings50973
YTD Return+11.01%Best-16.79%
1Y Return+15.60%-
3Y Return (annualized)+20.82%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.60%-
Top 10 Weight37.6%34.4%Best
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)WisdomTree Investments
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendAll Cap Blend
InceptionSep 7, 2010May 14, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

VOO vs WDRN growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

VOO vs WDRN Performance

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and WisdomTree Physical AI, Humanoids, and Drones Fund ETF (WDRN) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Year to date, VOO is up 11.01% versus a loss of 16.79% for WDRN.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VOO charges 0.03% per year while WDRN charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.04% against 0.00% for WDRN.

Holdings Overlap

VOO already in WDRN9.9%
WDRN already in VOO23.8%

9.9% of VOO's money is in holdings WDRN also owns. 23.8% of WDRN's money is in holdings VOO also owns.

WDRN and VOO share little of their money.

9 positions in common, counted across the 494 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 57 in WDRN, against full books of 509 and 73.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 23 positions for WDRN that do not appear in our book for VOO (35.6% of the fund), and 478 for VOO that do not appear in WDRN (89.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VOOWeight in WDRNDifference
NVDANvidia Corp7.55%5.52%2.03%
TSLATesla Inc1.36%5.16%3.80%
DEDeere & Co Sedol 22612030.23%2.60%2.37%
ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc.0.19%2.16%1.97%
TERTeradyne Inc - Common0.09%2.13%2.04%
NXPINxp Semiconductors Nv Sedol B505Pn70.09%1.87%1.78%
ROKRockwell Automation0.08%1.68%1.60%
TDYTeledyne Technologies Inc0.05%1.52%1.47%
QCOMQualcomm Inc.0.24%1.16%0.92%

23.8% of WDRN is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

VOOWDRN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VOO or WDRN?

VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WDRN charges 0.45%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between VOO and WDRN?

23.8% of WDRN's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 23.8% of WDRN's is in holdings VOO also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 494 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 57 in WDRN.

Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or WDRN?

VOO yields 1.04% while WDRN yields 0.00%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is WDRN better than VOO?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. WDRN is less concentrated, with 34.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.