VTI vs VTWV
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTWV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | VTWV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $1.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 1.60% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 1,432 | |
| YTD Return | +12.65% | +23.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.39% | +37.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.54% | +19.05% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.11% | +9.60% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 19.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -47.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Sep 20, 2010 |
VTI vs VTWV Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VTI returned +21.39% while VTWV returned +37.45%. Year to date, VTI is up 12.65% versus a gain of 23.64% for VTWV.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.54% per year against +19.05% for VTWV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.11% and +9.60% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTWV has the edge at +9.57% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTWV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -47.3% for VTWV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while VTWV charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $6 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 1.60% for VTWV.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and VTWV share 1037 holdings out of 3169 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or VTWV?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VTWV charges 0.06%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or VTWV?
Over the past year VTI returned +21.39% vs +37.45% for VTWV, so VTWV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VTI annualized +8.07% vs +9.57% for VTWV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or VTWV?
VTWV has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs VTWV -47.3%.
Should I hold both VTI and VTWV?
VTI and VTWV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and VTWV?
VTI and VTWV share 1037 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3169 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or VTWV?
VTI yields 1.07% while VTWV yields 1.60%, so VTWV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.