VTI vs VTWV
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
Which is better, VTI or VTWV?
Large Cap Blend against Small Cap Value.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VTWV over 1Y. VTWV is less concentrated, with 5.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | VTWV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.06% |
| AUM | $666.9B | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 1.60% |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 1,432 |
| YTD Return | +11.53% | +20.49%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.74% | +26.39%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.67%Best | +18.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.59%Best | +8.58% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5%Best | 19.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.0%Best | -47.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,303Best | $15,092 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.3% | 5.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Value |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Sep 20, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 22, 2010 to Sep 15, 2026 (16 years).
VTI vs VTWV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
VTI vs VTWV Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VTI returned +15.74% while VTWV returned +26.39%. Year to date, VTI is up 11.53% versus a gain of 20.49% for VTWV.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +20.67% per year against +18.48% for VTWV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.59% and +8.58% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.88% annualized vs +9.35%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTWV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.4% compared with 14.5% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.0% for VTI and -47.3% for VTWV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while VTWV charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $6 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 1.60% for VTWV.
Holdings Overlap
1.3% of VTI's money is in holdings VTWV also owns. 91.3% of VTWV's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Most of VTWV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
1,230 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 1,332 in VTWV, against full books of 3,543 and 1,432.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 51 positions for VTWV that do not appear in our book for VTI (3.7% of the fund), and 1,023 for VTI that do not appear in VTWV (96.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VTI | Weight in VTWV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| UMBFUmb Financial Corp. | 0.01% | 0.64% | 0.63% |
| VSATViasat Inc | 0.01% | 0.63% | 0.62% |
| CTRECaretrust Reit Inc Reit Usd.01 | 0.01% | 0.61% | 0.60% |
| CYTKCytokinetics Inc | 0.01% | 0.59% | 0.58% |
| ONBOld National Bancorp/In Common Stock | 0.01% | 0.53% | 0.52% |
| JXNJackson Financial Inc USD | 0.01% | 0.52% | 0.51% |
| TRNOTerreno Realty Corp | 0.01% | 0.49% | 0.48% |
| MACThe Macerich Company | 0.01% | 0.48% | 0.47% |
| SMSm Energy Co | 0.01% | 0.48% | 0.47% |
| TEXTerex Corp | 0.01% | 0.47% | 0.46% |
91.3% of VTWV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or VTWV?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VTWV charges 0.06%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VTI or VTWV?
Over the past year VTI returned +15.74% vs +26.39% for VTWV, so VTWV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VTI annualized +12.88% vs +9.35% for VTWV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VTI or VTWV?
VTWV has been the more volatile fund at 19.4% annualized versus 14.5% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -35.0% vs VTWV -47.3%.
Should I hold both VTI and VTWV?
VTI and VTWV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and VTWV?
91.3% of VTWV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 91.3% of VTWV's is in holdings VTI also owns. They hold 1,230 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 1,332 in VTWV.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or VTWV?
VTI yields 1.03% while VTWV yields 1.60%, so VTWV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTWV better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VTWV over 1Y. VTWV is less concentrated, with 5.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.