VTI vs XES

VTI vs XES

Which is better, VTI or XES?

Large Cap Blend against Small Cap Value.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 3Y and the full window, XES over 1Y and 5Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVTIXES
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.35%
AUM$666.9B$400M
Dividend Yield1.03%1.07%
Holdings3,54335
YTD Return+13.60%+33.18%Best
1Y Return+18.17%+54.88%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+23.04%Best+6.88%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.14%+16.19%Best
Volatility (annualized)15.7%Best39.7%
Max Drawdown-56.6%Best-96.1%
$10,000 over 5 years$17,734$21,176Best
Top 10 Weight33.3%Best41.5%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)State Street Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendSmall Cap Value
InceptionMay 24, 2001Jun 19, 2006

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 22, 2006 to Sep 25, 2026 (20.3 years).

VTI vs XES growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 20.3 years both funds cover.

VTI vs XES Performance

Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year VTI returned +18.17% while XES returned +54.88%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.60% versus a gain of 33.18% for XES.

Over three years, VTI compounded at +23.04% per year against +6.88% for XES; over five years the annualized figures are +12.14% and +16.19% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.78% annualized vs -4.16%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

XES has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.7% compared with 15.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -96.1% for XES. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VTI charges 0.03% per year while XES charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 1.07% for XES.

Holdings Overlap

VTI already in XES0.3%
XES already in VTI96.1%

0.3% of VTI's money is in holdings XES also owns. 96.1% of XES's money is in holdings VTI also owns.

Most of XES is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

33 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 35 in XES, against full books of 3,543 and 35.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1 positions for XES that do not appear in our book for VTI (0.1% of the fund), and 1,138 for VTI that do not appear in XES (97.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VTIWeight in XESDifference
OIIOceaneering Intl Inc.0.01%4.84%4.83%
TDWTidewater Inc0.00%4.66%4.66%
WHDCactus Inc.0.01%4.45%4.44%
0RMV:LNTechnipfmc Plc Ordinary Shares0.04%4.11%4.07%
SLBSchlumberger Nv.0.10%3.98%3.88%
HPHelmerich & Payne, Inc.0.00%4.07%4.07%
SDRL:BMSeadrill Ltd Common Shares0.00%4.00%4.00%
WTTRSelect Energy Services Inc0.00%3.89%3.89%
PTENPatterson-Uti Energy Inc0.01%3.83%3.82%
BKRBaker Hughes Co0.08%3.71%3.63%

96.1% of XES is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

VTIXES

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VTI or XES?

VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XES charges 0.35%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, VTI or XES?

Over the past year VTI returned +18.17% vs +54.88% for XES, so XES leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), VTI annualized +9.78% vs -4.16% for XES. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, VTI or XES?

XES has been the more volatile fund at 39.7% annualized versus 15.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs XES -96.1%.

Should I hold both VTI and XES?

VTI and XES have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between VTI and XES?

96.1% of XES's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 96.1% of XES's is in holdings VTI also owns. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 35 in XES.

Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or XES?

VTI yields 1.03% while XES yields 1.07%, so XES currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XES better than VTI?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 3Y and the full window, XES over 1Y and 5Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.