VTI vs XME
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. XME delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | XME | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.35% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $4.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 0.37% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 41 | |
| YTD Return | +13.14% | +11.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.35% | +54.57% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.83% | +33.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.01% | +23.67% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 34.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -87.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Jun 19, 2006 |
VTI vs XME Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year VTI returned +22.35% while XME returned +54.57%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.14% versus a gain of 11.13% for XME.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.83% per year against +33.40% for XME; over five years the annualized figures are +12.01% and +23.67% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +5.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XME has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -87.3% for XME. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while XME charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 0.37% for XME.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and XME share 26 holdings out of 2801 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or XME?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XME charges 0.35%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or XME?
Over the past year VTI returned +22.35% vs +54.57% for XME, so XME leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), VTI annualized +8.09% vs +5.19% for XME. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or XME?
XME has been the more volatile fund at 34.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs XME -87.3%.
Should I hold both VTI and XME?
VTI and XME have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and XME?
VTI and XME share 26 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2801 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or XME?
VTI yields 1.07% while XME yields 0.37%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.