VTI vs XRPT

VTI vs XRPT

Which is better, VTI or XRPT?

VTI has been ahead.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVTIXRPT
Expense Ratio0.03%Best3.13%
AUM$666.9B$84M
Dividend Yield1.03%3.75%
Holdings3,5433
YTD Return+12.28%Best-74.30%
1Y Return+16.78%Best-91.74%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.89%-
5Y Return (annualized)+11.94%-
Volatility (annualized)11.8%Best105.9%
Max Drawdown-8.9%Best-96.7%
$10,000 over 1.3 years$13,220Best$1,003
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Volatility Shares, LLC
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap Blend-
InceptionMay 24, 2001May 22, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 22, 2025 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.3 years).

VTI vs XRPT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.

VTI vs XRPT Performance

Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Volatility 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) is an ETF from Volatility Shares, LLC. Over the past year VTI returned +16.78% while XRPT returned -91.74%. Year to date, VTI is up 12.28% versus a loss of 74.30% for XRPT.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

XRPT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 105.9% compared with 11.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for VTI and -96.7% for XRPT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VTI charges 0.03% per year while XRPT charges 3.13%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $313 annually, a gap of $310 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 3.75% for XRPT.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of VTI and XRPT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

VTIXRPT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VTI or XRPT?

VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XRPT charges 3.13%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $310 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, VTI or XRPT?

Over the past year VTI returned +16.78% vs -91.74% for XRPT, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), VTI annualized +23.95% vs -82.95% for XRPT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, VTI or XRPT?

XRPT has been the more volatile fund at 105.9% annualized versus 11.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -8.9% vs XRPT -96.7%.

Should I hold both VTI and XRPT?

VTI and XRPT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or XRPT?

VTI yields 1.03% while XRPT yields 3.75%, so XRPT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XRPT better than VTI?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.