VTI vs YANG
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | YANG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.03% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $99M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 3.49% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 7 | |
| YTD Return | +13.38% | +34.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.12% | +15.29% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.85% | -47.92% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.44% | -38.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 66.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -100.0% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Dec 3, 2009 |
VTI vs YANG Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X ETF (YANG) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year VTI returned +21.12% while YANG returned +15.29%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.38% versus a gain of 34.72% for YANG.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.85% per year against -47.92% for YANG; over five years the annualized figures are +12.44% and -38.44% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.10% annualized vs -37.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
YANG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 66.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -100.0% for YANG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.40. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while YANG charges 1.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $103 annually, a gap of $100 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 3.49% for YANG.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and YANG share 0 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or YANG?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while YANG charges 1.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $100 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or YANG?
Over the past year VTI returned +21.12% vs +15.29% for YANG, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), VTI annualized +8.10% vs -37.99% for YANG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or YANG?
YANG has been the more volatile fund at 66.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs YANG -100.0%.
Should I hold both VTI and YANG?
VTI and YANG have a monthly-return correlation of -0.40, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and YANG?
VTI and YANG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or YANG?
VTI yields 1.07% while YANG yields 3.49%, so YANG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.