VYM vs XITK
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VYM | XITK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.45% | |
| AUM | $81.6B | $73M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.24% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 616 | 99 | |
| YTD Return | +15.60% | +13.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.48% | +11.72% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.07% | +16.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.50% | -0.62% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 25.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -65.6% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2006 | Jan 13, 2016 |
VYM vs XITK Performance
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year VYM returned +23.48% while XITK returned +11.72%. Year to date, VYM is up 15.60% versus a gain of 13.96% for XITK.
Over three years, VYM compounded at +19.07% per year against +16.96% for XITK; over five years the annualized figures are +12.50% and -0.62% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, XITK has the edge at +14.82% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XITK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.1% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for VYM and -65.6% for XITK. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VYM charges 0.04% per year while XITK charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $45 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VYM currently yields 2.24% against 0.00% for XITK.
Holdings Overlap
VYM and XITK share 3 holdings out of 697 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VYM or XITK?
VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04% while XITK charges 0.45%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VYM or XITK?
Over the past year VYM returned +23.48% vs +11.72% for XITK, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), VYM annualized +7.05% vs +14.82% for XITK. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VYM or XITK?
XITK has been the more volatile fund at 25.1% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: VYM -58.8% vs XITK -65.6%.
Should I hold both VYM and XITK?
VYM and XITK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VYM and XITK?
VYM and XITK share 3 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 697 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VYM or XITK?
VYM yields 2.24% while XITK yields 0.00%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.