IVV vs XITK
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
Which is better, IVV or XITK?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. XITK is less concentrated, with 25.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XITK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.45% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $70M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 97 |
| YTD Return | +11.57%Best | +8.05% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +1.50% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71%Best | +12.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80%Best | -3.19% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1%Best | 25.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -65.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,262Best | $8,504 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 25.4%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 13, 2016 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 14, 2016 to Sep 10, 2026 (10.7 years).
IVV vs XITK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.7 years both funds cover.
IVV vs XITK Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while XITK returned +1.50%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 8.05% for XITK.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.71% per year against +12.97% for XITK; over five years the annualized figures are +12.80% and -3.19% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.58% annualized vs +14.16%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XITK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -65.6% for XITK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XITK charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for XITK.
Holdings Overlap
19.2% of IVV's money is in holdings XITK also owns. 16.2% of XITK's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
IVV and XITK share little of their money.
16 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 97 in XITK, against full books of 508 and 97.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 75 positions for XITK that do not appear in our book for IVV (78.1% of the fund), and 479 for IVV that do not appear in XITK (80.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in XITK | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 1.15% | 6.83% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.19% | 1.15% | 2.04% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.98% | 1.10% | 1.88% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 1.18% | 2.33% | 1.15% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 1.94% | 0.86% | 1.08% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc. Class A | 0.14% | 1.87% | 1.73% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 0.31% | 1.45% | 1.14% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.55% | 0.84% | 0.29% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 0.47% | 0.73% | 0.26% |
| SMCISuper Micro Computer Inc | 0.03% | 0.93% | 0.90% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and XITK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XITK?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XITK charges 0.45%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or XITK?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +1.50% for XITK, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +14.58% vs +14.16% for XITK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or XITK?
XITK has been the more volatile fund at 25.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs XITK -65.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and XITK?
IVV and XITK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and XITK?
19.2% of IVV's money is in holdings XITK also owns. 16.2% of XITK's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 97 in XITK.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XITK?
IVV yields 1.06% while XITK yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XITK better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. XITK is less concentrated, with 25.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.