VOO vs XITK
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | XITK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.45% | |
| AUM | $997.4B | $73M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 99 | |
| YTD Return | +13.20% | +13.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.62% | +11.72% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.16% | +16.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.42% | -0.62% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 25.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -65.6% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Jan 13, 2016 |
VOO vs XITK Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year VOO returned +21.62% while XITK returned +11.72%. Year to date, VOO is up 13.20% versus a gain of 13.96% for XITK.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +22.16% per year against +16.96% for XITK; over five years the annualized figures are +13.42% and -0.62% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, XITK has the edge at +14.82% annualized vs +13.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XITK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -65.6% for XITK. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while XITK charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 0.00% for XITK.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and XITK share 16 holdings out of 586 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or XITK?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XITK charges 0.45%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or XITK?
Over the past year VOO returned +21.62% vs +11.72% for XITK, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), VOO annualized +13.51% vs +14.82% for XITK. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or XITK?
XITK has been the more volatile fund at 25.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs XITK -65.6%.
Should I hold both VOO and XITK?
VOO and XITK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and XITK?
VOO and XITK share 16 common holdings with a 7.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 586 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or XITK?
VOO yields 1.08% while XITK yields 0.00%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.