VYM vs XMLV

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVYMXMLVWinner
Expense Ratio0.04%0.25%
AUM$79.0B$757M
Dividend Yield2.86%2.93%
Holdings56883
YTD Return+15.80%+11.73%
1Y Return+26.12%+13.95%
3Y Return (annualized)+18.25%+11.74%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.51%+7.12%
Volatility (annualized)14.6%13.4%
Max Drawdown-58.8%-40.5%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Invesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionNov 10, 2006Feb 12, 2013

VYM vs XMLV Performance

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year VYM returned +26.12% while XMLV returned +13.95%. Year to date, VYM is up 15.80% versus a gain of 11.73% for XMLV.

Over three years, VYM compounded at +18.25% per year against +11.74% for XMLV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.51% and +7.12% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, XMLV has the edge at +8.68% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.4% for XMLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for VYM and -40.5% for XMLV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VYM charges 0.04% per year while XMLV charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $25 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VYM currently yields 2.86% against 2.93% for XMLV.

Holdings Overlap

1.1%overlap

VYM and XMLV share 34 holdings out of 604 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VYMWeight in XMLVDifference
PNM0.03%2.84%2.81%
OGE0.04%1.68%1.64%
IDA0.03%1.62%1.59%
NJRProProPro
PORProProPro
THGProProPro
RLIProProPro
INGRProProPro
AFGProProPro
AMProProPro
See all 10 holdings VYM shares with XMLV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VYM or XMLV?

VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04% while XMLV charges 0.25%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.

Which performed better, VYM or XMLV?

Over the past year VYM returned +26.12% vs +13.95% for XMLV, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), VYM annualized +7.07% vs +8.68% for XMLV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, VYM or XMLV?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.4% for XMLV. Worst drawdown: VYM -58.8% vs XMLV -40.5%.

Should I hold both VYM and XMLV?

VYM and XMLV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between VYM and XMLV?

VYM and XMLV share 34 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 604 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, VYM or XMLV?

VYM yields 2.86% while XMLV yields 2.93%, so XMLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →