FQAL vs TYLG
vs
FQAL vs TYLG
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 124 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 8.55% |
| Holdings Count | 130 | 74 |
| Inception Date | 2016-09-12 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | +1.52% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | +1.40% | -0.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +15.18% | +15.55% |
| 3-Year Return | +19.11% | +22.29% |
| 5-Year Return | +14.01% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 74 | - |
| Momentum Score | 49 | - |
| Value Score | 74 | - |
Holdings Overlap
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FQAL or TYLG?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while TYLG charges 0.60%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FQAL and TYLG hold the same stocks?
FQAL and TYLG share 13 common holdings with a 26.6% weight overlap. They hold 182 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FQAL or TYLG?
Over the past year, FQAL returned +15.18% while TYLG returned +15.55%. TYLG outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.