ABLD vs PSIL
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF vs ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF
Which is better, ABLD or PSIL?
Each has led over a different period.
ABLD has a lower expense ratio. ABLD led over the full window, PSIL over 1Y and 3Y. ABLD is less concentrated, with 35.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLD | PSIL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 1.00% |
| AUM | $99M | $53M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.37% | 6.88% |
| Holdings | 51 | 33 |
| YTD Return | +8.40% | +23.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.95% | +19.27%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.74% | +16.79%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -22.66% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1%Best | 48.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.4%Best | -87.9% |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $16,495Best | $3,990 |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.5%Best | 69.3% |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | Advisor Shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2021 | Sep 15, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 14, 2021 to Oct 12, 2026 (4.8 years).
ABLD vs PSIL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
ABLD vs PSIL Performance
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) is an ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and ADVISORSHARES PSYCHEDELICS ETF (PSIL) is an ETF from Advisor Shares. Over the past year ABLD returned +12.95% while PSIL returned +19.27%. Year to date, ABLD is up 8.40% versus a gain of 23.55% for PSIL.
Over three years, ABLD compounded at +9.74% per year against +16.79% for PSIL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 48.4% compared with 17.1% for ABLD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.4% for ABLD and -87.9% for PSIL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.22. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLD charges 0.39% per year while PSIL charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $100 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLD currently yields 3.37% against 6.88% for PSIL.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 50 holdings in ABLD and 29 in PSIL, totalling 99.4% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 29 in PSIL, against full books of 51 and 33.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 18 positions for PSIL that do not appear in our book for ABLD (56.1% of the fund), and 32 for ABLD that do not appear in PSIL (67.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABLD and PSIL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLD or PSIL?
ABLD has an expense ratio of 0.39% while PSIL charges 1.00%. ABLD is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABLD or PSIL?
Over the past year ABLD returned +12.95% vs +19.27% for PSIL, so PSIL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABLD or PSIL?
PSIL has been the more volatile fund at 48.4% annualized versus 17.1% for ABLD. Worst drawdown: ABLD -19.4% vs PSIL -87.9%.
Should I hold both ABLD and PSIL?
ABLD and PSIL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.22, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLD or PSIL?
ABLD yields 3.37% while PSIL yields 6.88%, so PSIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PSIL better than ABLD?
ABLD has a lower expense ratio. ABLD led over the full window, PSIL over 1Y and 3Y. ABLD is less concentrated, with 35.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.