ABLD vs SCHV
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF vs Schwab US Large-Cap Value ETF
Which is better, ABLD or SCHV?
Each has led over a different period.
SCHV has a lower expense ratio. ABLD led over the full window, SCHV over 1Y and 3Y. SCHV is less concentrated, with 20.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABLD | SCHV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $99M | $15.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.37% | 1.77% |
| Holdings | 51 | 560 |
| YTD Return | +8.91% | +15.24%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.49% | +20.45%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.55% | +19.16%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.74% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.4%Best | -19.8% |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $16,574Best | $15,932 |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.5% | 20.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2021 | Dec 11, 2009 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 14, 2021 to Oct 13, 2026 (4.8 years).
ABLD vs SCHV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
ABLD vs SCHV Performance
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) is an ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and Schwab US Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year ABLD returned +13.49% while SCHV returned +20.45%. Year to date, ABLD is up 8.91% versus a gain of 15.24% for SCHV.
Over three years, ABLD compounded at +9.55% per year against +19.16% for SCHV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 14.8% for SCHV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.4% for ABLD and -19.8% for SCHV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABLD charges 0.39% per year while SCHV charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $4 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABLD currently yields 3.37% against 1.77% for SCHV.
Holdings Overlap
16.8% of ABLD's money is in holdings SCHV also owns. 4.4% of SCHV's money is in holdings ABLD also owns.
ABLD and SCHV share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 555 in SCHV, against full books of 51 and 560.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 532 positions for SCHV that do not appear in our book for ABLD (94.3% of the fund), and 25 for ABLD that do not appear in SCHV (50.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ABLD | Weight in SCHV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| APAAPA Corp. | 4.37% | 0.05% | 4.32% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 3.67% | 0.43% | 3.24% |
| SPGSimon Property Group Inc | 3.43% | 0.21% | 3.22% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 1.17% | 2.17% | 1.00% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 1.08% | 1.27% | 0.19% |
| AOSAo Smith Corp. | 2.17% | 0.02% | 2.15% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 0.86% | 0.25% | 0.61% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABLD and SCHV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABLD or SCHV?
ABLD has an expense ratio of 0.39% while SCHV charges 0.04%. SCHV is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABLD or SCHV?
Over the past year ABLD returned +13.49% vs +20.45% for SCHV, so SCHV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABLD or SCHV?
ABLD has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 14.8% for SCHV. Worst drawdown: ABLD -19.4% vs SCHV -19.8%.
Should I hold both ABLD and SCHV?
ABLD and SCHV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABLD and SCHV?
16.8% of ABLD's money is in holdings SCHV also owns. 4.4% of SCHV's is in holdings ABLD also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABLD and 555 in SCHV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABLD or SCHV?
ABLD yields 3.37% while SCHV yields 1.77%, so ABLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHV better than ABLD?
SCHV has a lower expense ratio. ABLD led over the full window, SCHV over 1Y and 3Y. SCHV is less concentrated, with 20.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.