ACSM vs EPSB
Hartford Alpha Capture SMID Cap ETF vs Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF
Which is better, ACSM or EPSB?
ACSM costs less.
ACSM has a lower expense ratio. ACSM is less concentrated, with 11.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 27.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACSM | EPSB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52%Best | 0.88% |
| AUM | $20M | $7M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.17% |
| Holdings | 202 | 117 |
| YTD Return | +4.80% | +17.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.94% |
| Top 10 Weight | 11.2%Best | 27.6% |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2026 | May 1, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ACSM vs EPSB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACSM vs EPSB Performance
Hartford Alpha Capture SMID Cap ETF (ACSM) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, ACSM is up 4.80% versus a gain of 17.57% for EPSB.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACSM charges 0.52% per year while EPSB charges 0.88%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $88 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACSM currently yields 0.00% against 1.17% for EPSB.
Holdings Overlap
4.2% of ACSM's money is in holdings EPSB also owns. 15.7% of EPSB's money is in holdings ACSM also owns.
EPSB and ACSM share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 202 positions we hold weights for in ACSM and 58 in EPSB, against full books of 202 and 117.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 48 positions for EPSB that do not appear in our book for ACSM (81.2% of the fund), and 191 for ACSM that do not appear in EPSB (90.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACSM | Weight in EPSB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOG.AMoog Inccommon Stock | 0.25% | 3.31% | 3.06% |
| BOXBox Inc - Class A | 1.06% | 1.84% | 0.78% |
| FCFSFirstcash Inc | 0.55% | 2.19% | 1.64% |
| CACICaci International Inc, Class A | 0.46% | 2.19% | 1.73% |
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 0.24% | 2.20% | 1.96% |
| SANMSanmina Corp | 0.41% | 1.85% | 1.44% |
| SONSonoco Products Company | 1.00% | 1.15% | 0.15% |
| WECWec Energy Group Inc. | 0.18% | 0.96% | 0.78% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACSM and EPSB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACSM or EPSB?
ACSM has an expense ratio of 0.52% while EPSB charges 0.88%. ACSM is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ACSM and EPSB?
15.7% of EPSB's money is in holdings ACSM also owns. 15.7% of EPSB's is in holdings ACSM also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 202 positions we hold weights for in ACSM and 58 in EPSB.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACSM or EPSB?
ACSM yields 0.00% while EPSB yields 1.17%, so EPSB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is EPSB better than ACSM?
ACSM has a lower expense ratio. ACSM is less concentrated, with 11.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 27.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.