ACSV vs IVV
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ACSV or IVV?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ACSV led over 1Y. ACSV is less concentrated, with 17.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACSV | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $22M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.81% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 202 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +19.03%Best | +11.57% |
| 1Y Return | +22.78%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| Top 10 Weight | 17.3%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | American Century ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ACSV vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACSV vs IVV Performance
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) is an ETF from American Century ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ACSV returned +22.78% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, ACSV is up 19.03% versus a gain of 11.57% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACSV charges 0.49% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACSV currently yields 0.81% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 201 holdings in ACSV and 505 in IVV, totalling 99.9% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 201 positions we hold weights for in ACSV and 505 in IVV, against full books of 202 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 495 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ACSV (99.3% of the fund), and 185 for ACSV that do not appear in IVV (93.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACSV and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACSV or IVV?
ACSV has an expense ratio of 0.49% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACSV or IVV?
Over the past year ACSV returned +22.78% vs +17.57% for IVV, so ACSV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACSV or IVV?
ACSV yields 0.81% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ACSV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ACSV led over 1Y. ACSV is less concentrated, with 17.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.