ACSV vs IVV
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ACSV or IVV?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ACSV led over 1Y and the full window. ACSV is less concentrated, with 17.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACSV | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $24M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 419 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +20.38%Best | +10.99% |
| 1Y Return | +25.20%Best | +11.30% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.62% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.79% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 12.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.8%Best | -8.9% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $12,299Best | $11,440 |
| Top 10 Weight | 17.4%Best | 38.9% |
| Fund Family | American Century ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 16, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026 (1 years).
ACSV vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
ACSV vs IVV Performance
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) is an ETF from American Century ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ACSV returned +25.20% while IVV returned +11.30%. Year to date, ACSV is up 20.38% versus a gain of 10.99% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACSV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 12.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.8% for ACSV and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACSV charges 0.49% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACSV currently yields 1.08% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.6% of ACSV's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 201 positions we hold weights for in ACSV and 506 in IVV, against full books of 419 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 499 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ACSV (99.4% of the fund), and 183 for ACSV that do not appear in IVV (94.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACSV | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AOSAo Smith Corp. | 0.56% | 0.01% | 0.55% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACSV and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACSV or IVV?
ACSV has an expense ratio of 0.49% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACSV or IVV?
Over the past year ACSV returned +25.20% vs +11.30% for IVV, so ACSV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ACSV annualized +22.99% vs +14.40% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACSV or IVV?
ACSV has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 12.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ACSV -8.8% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both ACSV and IVV?
ACSV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACSV or IVV?
ACSV yields 1.08% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ACSV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ACSV led over 1Y and the full window. ACSV is less concentrated, with 17.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.