ACSV vs VOO

ACSV vs VOO

Which is better, ACSV or VOO?

Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. ACSV led over 1Y. ACSV is less concentrated, with 17.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns (1Y): ACSVLess Concentrated: ACSV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACSVVOO
Expense Ratio0.49%0.03%Best
AUM$22M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.81%1.04%
Holdings202509
YTD Return+19.03%Best+11.55%
1Y Return+22.78%Best+17.54%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.71%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.80%
Top 10 Weight17.3%Best36.4%
Fund FamilyAmerican Century ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 14, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ACSV vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ACSV vs VOO Performance

American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) is an ETF from American Century ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ACSV returned +22.78% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, ACSV is up 19.03% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACSV charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACSV currently yields 0.81% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 201 holdings in ACSV and 505 in VOO, totalling 99.9% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, ACSV as of Aug 18, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

0 positions in common, counted across the 201 positions we hold weights for in ACSV and 505 in VOO, against full books of 202 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 496 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for ACSV (99.4% of the fund), and 185 for ACSV that do not appear in VOO (93.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ACSV and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ACSVVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACSV or VOO?

ACSV has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, ACSV or VOO?

Over the past year ACSV returned +22.78% vs +17.54% for VOO, so ACSV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACSV or VOO?

ACSV yields 0.81% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than ACSV?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. ACSV led over 1Y. ACSV is less concentrated, with 17.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.