ACSV vs VXUS
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, ACSV or VXUS?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACSV | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $22M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.81% | 2.59% |
| Holdings | 202 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +22.34%Best | +16.15% |
| 1Y Return | +26.19% | +27.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.09% |
| Fund Family | American Century ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ACSV vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACSV vs VXUS Performance
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) is an ETF from American Century ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ACSV returned +26.19% while VXUS returned +27.58%. Year to date, ACSV is up 22.34% versus a gain of 16.15% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACSV charges 0.49% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $5 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACSV currently yields 0.81% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.7% of ACSV's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, ACSV as of Aug 18, 2026 and VXUS as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 201 positions we hold weights for in ACSV and 8,092 in VXUS, against full books of 202 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACSV | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MTX:SGMinerals Technologies Inc | 0.74% | 0.05% | 0.69% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACSV and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACSV or VXUS?
ACSV has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACSV or VXUS?
Over the past year ACSV returned +26.19% vs +27.58% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACSV or VXUS?
ACSV yields 0.81% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than ACSV?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.