ADIV vs QQQ
Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ADIV | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.78% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $56M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.84% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 37 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +9.27% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.09% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.59% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.66% | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | SmartETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2006 | Mar 10, 1999 |
ADIV vs QQQ Performance
Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) is a ETF from SmartETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ADIV returned +11.09% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, ADIV is up 9.27% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, ADIV compounded at +18.59% per year against +26.64% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +7.66% and +15.36% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.6% for ADIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.6% for ADIV and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ADIV charges 0.78% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $18 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADIV currently yields 2.84% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ADIV or QQQ?
ADIV has an expense ratio of 0.78% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $60 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ADIV or QQQ?
Over the past year ADIV returned +11.09% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), ADIV annualized +7.03% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ADIV or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.6% for ADIV. Worst drawdown: ADIV -31.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both ADIV and QQQ?
ADIV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ADIV and QQQ?
ADIV and QQQ share 2 common holdings with a 3.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 136 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ADIV or QQQ?
ADIV yields 2.84% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so ADIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.