ADIV vs IVV
Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ADIV | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.78% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $56M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.84% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 37 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +9.63% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.45% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.51% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.03% | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | SmartETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2006 | May 15, 2000 |
ADIV vs IVV Performance
Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) is a ETF from SmartETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ADIV returned +12.45% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, ADIV is up 9.63% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, ADIV compounded at +19.51% per year against +22.08% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.03% and +12.96% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, ADIV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ADIV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.6% for ADIV and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ADIV charges 0.78% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $3 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADIV currently yields 2.84% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ADIV and IVV share 3 holdings out of 538 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ADIV or IVV?
ADIV has an expense ratio of 0.78% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ADIV or IVV?
Over the past year ADIV returned +12.45% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), ADIV annualized +7.07% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ADIV or IVV?
ADIV has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ADIV -31.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ADIV and IVV?
ADIV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ADIV and IVV?
ADIV and IVV share 3 common holdings with a 3.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 538 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ADIV or IVV?
ADIV yields 2.84% while IVV yields 1.10%, so ADIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.