AEMC vs EPMB
Harbor AlphaEdge Mid Cap Core ETF vs Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF
Which is better, AEMC or EPMB?
AEMC costs less.
AEMC has a lower expense ratio. EPMB is less concentrated, with 24.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AEMC | EPMB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35%Best | 0.88% |
| AUM | $2M | $4M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.55% |
| Holdings | 223 | 119 |
| YTD Return | -0.68% | +15.34%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +23.25% |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.2% | 24.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 26, 2026 | May 1, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
AEMC vs EPMB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AEMC vs EPMB Performance
Harbor AlphaEdge Mid Cap Core ETF (AEMC) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF (EPMB) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, AEMC is down 0.68% versus a gain of 15.34% for EPMB.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AEMC charges 0.35% per year while EPMB charges 0.88%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $88 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AEMC currently yields 0.00% against 1.55% for EPMB.
Holdings Overlap
4.0% of AEMC's money is in holdings EPMB also owns. 11.3% of EPMB's money is in holdings AEMC also owns.
EPMB and AEMC share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in AEMC and 60 in EPMB, against full books of 223 and 119.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 53 positions for EPMB that do not appear in our book for AEMC (85.7% of the fund), and 102 for AEMC that do not appear in EPMB (93.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AEMC and EPMB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AEMC or EPMB?
AEMC has an expense ratio of 0.35% while EPMB charges 0.88%. AEMC is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between AEMC and EPMB?
11.3% of EPMB's money is in holdings AEMC also owns. 11.3% of EPMB's is in holdings AEMC also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in AEMC and 60 in EPMB.
Which pays a higher dividend, AEMC or EPMB?
AEMC yields 0.00% while EPMB yields 1.55%, so EPMB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is EPMB better than AEMC?
AEMC has a lower expense ratio. EPMB is less concentrated, with 24.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.