AMEI vs SCHD
Amana Equity Income ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, AMEI or SCHD?
SCHD has been ahead.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMEI | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 32 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +0.58% | +25.07%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.58% | +27.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.74% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.89% |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 13.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -95.0% | -16.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.5 years | $520 | $16,305Best |
| Fund Family | Amana Mutual Funds Trust | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2026 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 27, 2023 to Sep 11, 2026 (3.5 years).
AMEI vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.
AMEI vs SCHD Performance
Amana Equity Income ETF (AMEI) is an ETF from Amana Mutual Funds Trust and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year AMEI returned +0.58% while SCHD returned +27.61%. Year to date, AMEI is up 0.58% versus a gain of 25.07% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -95.0% for AMEI and -16.1% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMEI charges 0.76% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $6 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMEI currently yields 0.00% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
At least 19.2% of SCHD's money is in holdings AMEI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for AMEI, our book for it covers 93.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
SCHD and AMEI share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in AMEI and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 32 and 103.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMEI and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMEI or SCHD?
AMEI has an expense ratio of 0.76% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMEI or SCHD?
Over the past year AMEI returned +0.58% vs +27.61% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AMEI annualized -57.03% vs +14.99% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AMEI and SCHD?
At least 19.2% of SCHD's money is in holdings AMEI also owns. Our book for AMEI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in AMEI and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMEI or SCHD?
AMEI yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than AMEI?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.