AMEM vs IVV
Amana Developing World ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AMEM or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMEM | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.91% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 64 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -0.67% | +12.76%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.95% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.54% |
| Fund Family | Amana Mutual Funds Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
AMEM vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AMEM vs IVV Performance
Amana Developing World ETF (AMEM) is an ETF from Amana Mutual Funds Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, AMEM is down 0.67% versus a gain of 12.76% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMEM charges 0.91% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $91 vs $3 annually, a gap of $88 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMEM currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.4% of IVV's money is in holdings AMEM also owns.
Stated as a floor: for AMEM, our book for it covers 94.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
3 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in AMEM and 505 in IVV, against full books of 64 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMEM and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMEM or IVV?
AMEM has an expense ratio of 0.91% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $88 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMEM or IVV?
AMEM yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than AMEM?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.