AMOM vs ATFV
Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum ETF vs Alger 35 ETF
Which is better, AMOM or ATFV?
Each has led over a different period.
ATFV has a lower expense ratio. AMOM led over 1Y, ATFV over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMOM | ATFV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.55%Best |
| AUM | $23M | $629M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.17% |
| Holdings | 102 | 36 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.5%Best | 24.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.7%Best | -45.3% |
| $10,000 over 5.5 years | $16,481 | $19,320Best |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Alger |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 20, 2019 | May 4, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 10 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. AMOM has data through Oct 16, 2026 and ATFV through Oct 26, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 4, 2021 to Oct 16, 2026 (5.5 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ATFV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.1% compared with 22.5% for AMOM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.7% for AMOM and -45.3% for ATFV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMOM charges 0.75% per year while ATFV charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $55 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMOM currently yields 0.00% against 0.17% for ATFV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMOM and ATFV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMOM or ATFV?
AMOM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while ATFV charges 0.55%. ATFV is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, AMOM or ATFV?
ATFV has been the more volatile fund at 24.1% annualized versus 22.5% for AMOM. Worst drawdown: AMOM -39.7% vs ATFV -45.3%.
Should I hold both AMOM and ATFV?
AMOM and ATFV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMOM or ATFV?
AMOM yields 0.00% while ATFV yields 0.17%, so ATFV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ATFV better than AMOM?
ATFV has a lower expense ratio. AMOM led over 1Y, ATFV over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.