AMZA vs IVV
InfraCap MLP ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AMZA delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMZA | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.72% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $470M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.81% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +30.36% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.38% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.94% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +24.90% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -96.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Virtus Investment Partners | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2014 | May 15, 2000 |
AMZA vs IVV Performance
InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AMZA returned +27.38% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, AMZA is up 30.36% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, AMZA compounded at +22.94% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +24.90% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs -9.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMZA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.7% for AMZA and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMZA charges 1.72% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $172 vs $3 annually, a gap of $169 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMZA currently yields 7.81% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
AMZA and IVV share 7 holdings out of 527 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMZA or IVV?
AMZA has an expense ratio of 1.72% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $169 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AMZA or IVV?
Over the past year AMZA returned +27.38% vs +20.94% for IVV, so AMZA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), AMZA annualized -9.19% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AMZA or IVV?
AMZA has been the more volatile fund at 39.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: AMZA -96.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both AMZA and IVV?
AMZA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AMZA and IVV?
AMZA and IVV share 7 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 527 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMZA or IVV?
AMZA yields 7.81% while IVV yields 1.10%, so AMZA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.