AMZA vs VOO
InfraCap MLP ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. AMZA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMZA | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.72% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $466M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.16% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +30.08% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.47% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.49% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +23.25% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -96.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Virtus Investment Partners | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
AMZA vs VOO Performance
InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMZA returned +27.47% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, AMZA is up 30.08% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, AMZA compounded at +23.49% per year against +21.55% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +23.25% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs -9.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMZA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.7% for AMZA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMZA charges 1.72% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $172 vs $3 annually, a gap of $169 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMZA currently yields 8.16% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
AMZA and VOO share 7 holdings out of 527 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMZA or VOO?
AMZA has an expense ratio of 1.72% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $169 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AMZA or VOO?
Over the past year AMZA returned +27.47% vs +21.63% for VOO, so AMZA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), AMZA annualized -9.23% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AMZA or VOO?
AMZA has been the more volatile fund at 39.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: AMZA -96.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both AMZA and VOO?
AMZA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AMZA and VOO?
AMZA and VOO share 7 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 527 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMZA or VOO?
AMZA yields 8.16% while VOO yields 1.09%, so AMZA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.