AMZA vs VTI
InfraCap MLP ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, AMZA or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AMZA led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMZA | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.72% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $495M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.64% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 99 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +33.49%Best | +12.08% |
| 1Y Return | +32.72%Best | +16.31% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.87%Best | +20.83% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +24.45%Best | +11.89% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.7% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -96.7% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $29,852Best | $17,537 |
| Fund Family | Virtus Investment Partners | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 2, 2014 to Sep 14, 2026 (12 years).
AMZA vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12 years both funds cover.
AMZA vs VTI Performance
InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) is an ETF from Virtus Investment Partners and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMZA returned +32.72% while VTI returned +16.31%. Year to date, AMZA is up 33.49% versus a gain of 12.08% for VTI.
Over three years, AMZA compounded at +22.87% per year against +20.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +24.45% and +11.89% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.41% annualized vs -8.96%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMZA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.7% for AMZA and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMZA charges 1.72% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $172 vs $3 annually, a gap of $169 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMZA currently yields 7.64% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.8% of VTI's money is in holdings AMZA also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for AMZA, our book for it lists positions totalling 123.0% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
11 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in AMZA and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 99 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AMZA | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LNGCheniere Energy Inc. | 6.63% | 0.08% | 6.55% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 4.12% | 0.08% | 4.04% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 3.17% | 0.12% | 3.05% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 2.95% | 0.08% | 2.87% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Partners Lp/targa Resources Partners Finance Corp. | 2.30% | 0.08% | 2.22% |
| VLOValero Energy | 1.05% | 0.13% | 0.92% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 0.51% | 0.13% | 0.38% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 0.20% | 0.12% | 0.08% |
| DINOHF Sinclair Corp | 0.20% | 0.02% | 0.18% |
| VGVenture Global Inc | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.10% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMZA and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMZA or VTI?
AMZA has an expense ratio of 1.72% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $169 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMZA or VTI?
Over the past year AMZA returned +32.72% vs +16.31% for VTI, so AMZA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), AMZA annualized -8.96% vs +12.41% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMZA or VTI?
AMZA has been the more volatile fund at 39.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AMZA -96.7% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both AMZA and VTI?
AMZA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMZA or VTI?
AMZA yields 7.64% while VTI yields 1.03%, so AMZA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than AMZA?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AMZA led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.