AMZA vs VTI
InfraCap MLP ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AMZA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMZA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.72% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $470M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.81% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +30.55% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.46% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.14% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +24.53% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -96.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Virtus Investment Partners | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
AMZA vs VTI Performance
InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMZA returned +26.46% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, AMZA is up 30.55% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, AMZA compounded at +23.14% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +24.53% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs -9.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMZA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.7% for AMZA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMZA charges 1.72% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $172 vs $3 annually, a gap of $169 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMZA currently yields 7.81% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AMZA and VTI share 9 holdings out of 2807 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMZA or VTI?
AMZA has an expense ratio of 1.72% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $169 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AMZA or VTI?
Over the past year AMZA returned +26.46% vs +22.35% for VTI, so AMZA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), AMZA annualized -9.18% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AMZA or VTI?
AMZA has been the more volatile fund at 39.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AMZA -96.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AMZA and VTI?
AMZA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AMZA and VTI?
AMZA and VTI share 9 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2807 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMZA or VTI?
AMZA yields 7.81% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AMZA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.